Mouthsoaping For Men
I took a wrong turn while I was lost in the deep Googles, and wound up stumbling over a couple of photos of a naughty young man getting a punishment mouthsoaping. It’s a bit of a role reversal here at Spanking Blog, but perhaps some of you will nonetheless enjoy:
Pictures date from 2007 and are from a “male-to-male discipline” site called Spanking Central.
See Also:
Normally when I see something that doesn’t interest me I just scroll down your page but here even you proclaim you don’t like it either. So why post it? I could respect pussywhipped if you were actually getting some for that display of submission. But what’s the fun of being PCwhipped?
Seems to me the internet is a big enough place for people to focus on what they want.
Patrick, first of all I didn’t say I didn’t like it. At most, one might fairly infer that I “don’t enjoy” it, by negative implication from what I did say. There’s a lot of libidinous airspace between “don’t enjoy” and “dislike”, or so it seems to me.
As all my longtime readers will have deduced by now, I don’t particularly enjoy male/male spanking and punishment scenarios. Which means I don’t go looking for them, which means they are rare here on Spanking Blog.
However:
I do have gay male readers. I do have female readers who enjoy gay male scenarios. And I do have polymorphously perverse readers who enjoy spanking and punishment scenes of all kinds. And finally, I have a modest quantum of philosophical commitment to the value of sexual diversity. All of that combines such that on the rare occasion that I happen to stumble upon a male/male or male-submissive spanking item that strikes me as likely to please the audiences that enjoy such things, I will make such a post.
I *know* of two or three of my longtime readers who enjoy these things. Frankly, that’s enough reason even if I had no other.
Finally, Spanking Blog currently has 3,207 posts visible, dating back to 2003. I’d be surprised if there were as many as two dozen posts out of all that number that diverge from the standard M/f or F/f pairings. Really, that doesn’t seem like an excessive fraction, does it?
That’s cool, if you wanted to post it. Please forgive me for erroneously inferring you’d been influenced by the bullying comments I’ve seen on other blogs about boycotting sites that don’t have m/m stuff. And not from male gay bloggers, but female PC-heads. Telling other people they need to be more inclusive in their wet dreams seems like mind-rape, neither safe,;sane, nor consensual.
Respect for posting my comment, man, and thanks for clarifying your position.
I think it’s interesting that female spanks female is pretty much universally accepted among fans of spanking erotica but M/m still freaks some out.
Tony, I cannot agree more … but it’s a double standard that’s throughout het porn. Two guys is “gay, ewww” but two girls is “hot, nice!” I don’t like F/f spanking porn anywhere near as much as I like M/f, but there’s so much of it made, I still wind up putting a lot of it here.
Patrick, no problem. I didn’t understand where you were coming from because (as you are sort of learning just now) I’m very thick-skinned about my posting decisions. I post what I wanna post…
Tony, I agree that it’s interesting but it’s hardly surprising. M/m is not shown for the same reason f/f was under erasure during the Roman empire. Female nudes are idealized now while the male nude was the thing then.
What I mean is that the repugnance istn’t exactly homophobic but rather aimed at the male body. Most of us are socialized to cringe at any male nude if there’s not a woman in the pic. For example, a pic of a man masturbating alone would be as squicky as 2 men together, but 2 men w a woman or a man masturbating in front of a woman would be mainstream kink.